Shame vs. Guilt: Grandiosity, Self-Esteem, and the Fragile Thread of Accountability

When I first read Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents in high school, I couldn’t stop thinking about it. He was talking about something bigger than the individual: the psychology of civil society. His claim was simple: for civilization to exist, we have to give up some freedom and follow rules. To get people to buy in, we project the image of the father into the sky, call it God, and use religion to keep ourselves in line.

Freud was wrong about many things, but this image stuck with me because it captures a truth. Every society has to decide how to keep people in check. Religion did this for centuries. It wasn’t only about fear of sin but it gave us rituals for repair. Confession, penance, forgiveness, belonging. Small communities also relied on shame. If you lost face, you lost standing, and in a village that could mean survival itself. Religion and shame became two great pillars to keep society functioning and people in line.

But shame doesn’t work the same way in modern life. When societies grew larger, more anonymous, more diverse, shame wasn’t enough. What took its place was guilt: the feeling that I did something wrong, not that I am wrong. And with guilt came the possibility of accountability: the ability to admit fault without collapsing, to repair without destroying identity.

That only works if there is a moral compass. Guilt depends on having some set of beliefs about right and wrong. Healthy self-esteem allows us to bear guilt because guilt doesn’t threaten who we are, it just says we acted out of line with what we know is right. Religion once carried that structure. In modern societies, law, democracy, and cultural norms have to carry it instead. Without that compass, guilt falls apart, and accountability becomes intolerable.

This is where shame and guilt divide. Shame attacks the self: I am bad. Guilt separates act from identity: I did something bad. Shame corrodes because there’s no way out: you can only collapse or hide. Guilt offers a way forward: repair, responsibility, trust.

Shame usually begins early. A bullying parent, an authoritarian household, a family that uses humiliation as control — these systems raise children who don’t just feel they did something wrong, but that they are wrong. That’s the seed of a shame identity: brittle, unable to tolerate fault, desperate to rewrite the story or collapse under it.

This helps explain something we all recognize: our desperation to be right. Couples fight over the smallest things because being wrong doesn’t just mean “I made a mistake”: it carries the deeper fear of being bad. That’s why accountability is so difficult. Without healthy self-esteem, being wrong feels intolerable. Without a moral compass, guilt can’t hold its shape.

And when shame becomes unbearable, another path opens. Brené Brown calls it hubris. Terry Real calls it grandiosity. Instead of collapsing inward, the self inflates outward. Hubris is puffed-up pride, dominance, the refusal to ever be wrong. Grandiosity is what Terry Real describes as one-up: you bully the world instead of beating yourself down.

The difference is striking. Shame turns inward: the suffering is carried by the person who feels it. Grandiosity turns outward: the person feels fine, even powerful, while everyone else pays the cost. Like the guy smoking a cigar in an elevator. He’s comfortable; everyone else is choking.

Shame, guilt, and grandiosity are not abstract. They show up in marriages, workplaces, and politics every day. Couples fight about accountability: who will admit fault, who will change. Workers burn out because no one takes responsibility. Leaders destroy trust when they deny, deflect, or bully rather than owning mistakes.

Religion once softened the edges by combining shame with ritual repair. With its decline, accountability has become the thread holding modern life together. But it’s a fragile thread. Too much shame, and people collapse. Too much hubris, and they bully the world. Without a shared moral compass, guilt itself can’t hold.

Accountability matters because it sits in the middle. It lets us say, I was wrong, without becoming worthless or needing to dominate. It keeps marriages alive, workplaces functional, and democracies from sliding into denial and collapse.

The question is whether we can protect it: in ourselves, in our relationships, and in the systems we live inside.

Are you interested in working on your personal development? Are you looking for a life coach or a life consultant? Are you feeling stagnant? Do you want to jumpstart change?

 My transformational approach is a process where awareness, alignment, and action work together as catalysts to create momentum for change. 

*Awareness is knowing what you genuinely want and need.

*Alignment is the symmetry between our values and our actions. It means our inner and outer worlds match.

*Action is when you are conscious that what you say, do and think are in harmony with your values.

Together we build an understanding of what you want to accomplish, and delve deeply into building awareness around any thoughts and assumptions that you may already have. To truly transform your life, I will empower you to rethink what’s possible for you.

__

Learn more about my approach to life consulting and relationship coaching here or get in touch for your free 30-minute consultation here! Don’t forget to follow along @LilyManne on social for more regular updates!